Everything Is GRC

Healthcare AI sovereignty is a Governance, Risk & Compliance problem.

Not a gadget problem, not a model problem. Three questions decide whether AI belongs in a hospital: who governs it, what it exposes, and what you can prove.

Governance

Who decides what AI is allowed? What's the policy? Who's accountable when the model is wrong? Governance is named ownership, written policy, and an inventory of every AI system touching your data.

Your current state: Score your governance posture in 5 minutes →What we provide: Governance frameworks, policies, and the Nexus AI portfolio register →

Risk

What happens when nurses use ChatGPT with patient data? What's the exposure when your AI vendor is breached? Risk is the distance between what your policy assumes and what your staff actually do at 3 a.m.

Your current state: Find your shadow-AI and vendor exposure →What we provide: Live threat intelligence and sovereign architecture that removes the egress risk class →

Compliance

PHIPA, HIPAA, Bill 194 / O. Reg. 51/26, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF — are you meeting the bar, and can you prove it? Compliance is evidence on demand, not intentions in a binder.

Your current state: Map your gaps against the frameworks →What we provide: The full framework library — and architecture that generates its own evidence →

Signed-in operator looking for the governance dashboard? Open the AI portfolio →